Pheonix PD banning chokeholds

Before we get into this rant I am about to lay one you, I want everyone to understand that what I am about to say is in no way a slight on the LEOs and the defensive tactics instructors for the Phoenix PD. They were given a shit sandwich and told to turn it into Prime Rib and they were given about two days to do it. They did the best they could. This rant is on the sheer willful ignorance of the public, the mainstream media, and the police administration that is more concerned with public relations and appearances than on actual results.

So the Phoenix PD had banned the use of “choke holds” for officers during arrests. Now, I am writing a longer article to show how stupid this is, and the fact that as a recognized subject matter expert in this area, I am telling you that the choke hold is the single safest and most functional unarmed technique to use to stop an aggressive attacker and to do it with no harm to that attacker. PERIOD. I can – and will – back that up with documented and verifiable fact later this week, but today I am going to address the technique the Phoenix PD unveiled to replace the choke.

You can look at it here starting at the 13:39 mark:

https://www.facebook.com/ABC15/videos/269743547568833/

I am not going to address this issue from the point of view of arresting someone or the specific context of that. I am not, nor have I ever been a police officer, so I cannot in good conscience talk about that contextual application. What I can talk about is the efficacy of the demonstrated position, and it’s strength and weaknesses. The position the DT instructor shows is a very typical jiujitsu hold called a seatbelt. It is designed for one thing – to hold a person in place long enough to transition to a finishing hold. Used in the correct manner, on the ground with the opponent seated on his butt or belly, it is a decent control. Unfortunately, in the way it is being used to replace the choke hold, it will prove to be utterly useless.

Moreover – and here is the problem – IT WILL LEAD TO MORE INJURIES TO THE ARRESTEE AND IT WILL LEAD TO MORE SHOOTINGS BY THE OFFICER!

Why do I say that it if I just said above that it is a good control? Multiple reasons, but the most important one is this. It works in the ideal manner because you are on the ground – I.e. not standing – and can get your legs over theirs and place them above their hips and just inside their thighs. That way, you have a great method of controlling their movement. Standing upright as demonstrated in the video, you have very little control, and you only have that for a moment of two. The problems are 1) you have ZERO control of his lower body. The strongest part of a person that is the seat of the most explosive generated force a person can perform, and you do nothing to deal with it and, 2) you leave the other guy with one underhook. For those who don’t know anything about grappling, the underhook is any time I can get an arm between the other person’s arm and torso, and it is the king of grappling moves, especially if there is the presence of weapons. Take a look at the demonstrated technique in the video, and imagine weapons on the officer’s waistline. Note who one of the “bad guy” arms has complete freedom to move and is CLOSER to the officer’s weapons on that side than the officer does. Now what is going to happen when that officer realizes the other guy is going for his gun, or taser, or etc.? Is that not a guaranteed way to ramp up the violence and the end result? You better believe it.

For those who are going to argue that somehow the bad guy will be unable to move and won’t be able to get to the LEOs gun, let me assure not only can he, but that he will. I have been doing that exact move for quite literally decades, and I can flat out promise you that I cannot control someone in that position for more than a moment. If I cannot reliably do it, with 31 years of active training and practice, a police officer with minimal time in during his academy days, and little follow up after, will have no chance to do so. And now let’s add to the situation and make it worse. What if the person being detained is substantially bigger or stronger than the cop? What if he is much younger? How about if he is in a state of excited delirium from alcohol or drugs? Any of those would make it tougher for me to make that position work properly, let alone the LEO with only minimal training using it.  And I am even more concerned because the instructor was not even doing the two most important things to try to control form this position. Both use leverage and he was using all muscle. If he does not understand the details, how will the officers who need to learn it?

I will state this publicly now, and people can hold me to this. Banning the choke hold and replacing it with this will substantially increase the injury and death rate to both parties in the future. 100% guarantee.

bjj and baseball

What in the world does Brazilain Jiu-jitsu black belts have to do with baseball? Well, I will tell you.

People often remark about how self-effacing I am about my performance as a fighter. They say”but Cecil, you are a 3rd degree black belt in Brazilian Jiujitsu under a true legend of the art. You have to be uber successful when sparring!” Sure, I have some success, but I also have some crushing failures, and it is those failures that 1) keep me training, and 2) keep me humble.

When you do a fighting methodology that requires you to regularly get matched up against a resisting opponent with opposing will, malevolent intent, and freedom of action, some days you are going to lose. It is a fact of life. And even within what some people view as the highest level of fighting – i.e. black belt in Brazilian Jiu-jitsu, there is a hierarchy and sub-levels.

Fortunately belts still mean something in BJJ. Even with its popularity and a bit of watering down, the belts still are meaningful because you cannot hide from performance the way you can in almost all other martial arts or self-defense systems (“I can’t really spar because our art is too deadly” – yeah, sure it is fat man). You have to show you can go, cold and on demand.

Even still, I tell folks that there is a hierarchy with black belts, and the easiest way to understand it is like this. Think of jujitsu black belts as pro baseball players. They are all better than 98% of the population of the world in their ability to play the game, but they are not equal.

There are the minor leagues – A, AA, and AAA, then there are major leaguers, and then of the major leaguers, there are the All Stars. All are pros, but different.

Same as BJJ black belts. The equivalent of the single A and double A ball players are the black belts who are older, who have physical issues (whether from age or other causes), or who have not trained for years and years. For example, we had a student at my academy that got his black belt at 71. Jim was also a smaller and frailer person anyway. Can he roll at the same level as a 35 year old black belt? No way, but it does not take away from his knowledge and the time he has put in, and the fact that against his peer; he can roll at a high level. He is very much a legitimate black belt, but on a slightly separate plane.

Then you have the triple A belts. Guys who are not at the elite level, but can roll against the elite and at least make them work. Maybe, on a really, really great day, they may even catch the elite guy in something (probably not but we can dream!).

The major leaguers are obviously the black belts that are competing all the time, or the guys who are known throughout the community as tough guys to roll against. These are the current main high level players.

And the All Stars? Well, those are the legends and the truly greats and the current dominant competitors. The Roger Gracie’s, the Marcleo Garcias, the Gary Tonon’s , the Megaton Dias’ and the like are the ones that even people only slightly knowledgeable about BJJ tend to know. These are the ones, like a Babe Ruth or a Willie Mays, stand the test of time and leave a lasting mark on the art.

So where do I fit it? Well, I like to compare myself to Crash Davis, Kevin Costner’s character in the movie Bull Durham. He is an aging AAA player who almost made it in the big leagues but didn’t, and now he plays out his career in the minors. Bur while there, he is pretty decent and respected, and more importantly, he is a mentor to the up and coming young players who are destined to be far better than Crash ever was. He teaches them how to be better and more successful and even if he wishes he could have been more, he is fairly content to help the ones who come after. So the comparison for me is that I will contribute much more as a teacher, but when I roll with the major leaguers, I at least make them sweat a tiny bit before they thump me!

I hope this helps people to make sense of the levels of black belt. It is a great achievement (outside of being an okay husband and a better than mediocre Dad, it is my proudest one), and should be respected, but not all of us are walking death machines.

shotgun gear follow up

A follow up to my post yesterday about testing your gear in firearms training classes.

One piece of kit I was seriously looking at was the MatchSaverz shell holder. I had mounted one after taking Tom Givens Shotgun Instructor class last summer. One of the things that quickly becomes apparent when putting a lot of rounds through a shotgun is that keeping it fed can be a difficult task. There are not a ton of great answers (besides the reliable “do more work”) to this issue, so you have to take what you can get.

I had seen the MatchSaverZ device and it was certainly intriguing. A single shell holder that could be mounted right in front of the chamber for potentially a lighting fast single round reload is an awesome idea. The problems are twofold – 1) the holder itself is plastic and small, giving the impression it is not particularly rugged, which is compounded by issue 2) that the attachment of the holder to gun is not great. It is one screw going the shell holder channel into the forearm of the gun, which is then backed up with a velcro attachment. This is made worse by using the factory forend of the 1301. There are a lot of dips and curls in it, and finding a spot where I could drill through and drive the screw without compromising the action, and keeping it close enough to the chamber to be handy severely limited my options. I tried a number of different spots and used extra adhesive to give it some added support, but it still felt flimsy.

Understand me, this is understandable in it’s construction. I am not saying the company did a poor job of making or designing the item. There are just inherent limits to what can be done at a price point that works. Now, running this in dry fire and the little bit of range work I have done in the past year, I did not have any problems with the holder. It stayed on well, and did it’s job well. It is a perfect thing for the emergency load. But as I mentioned previously, going through an extended class and putting a lot of rounds through a gun under time constraints can reveal weaknesses, so I was interested in seeing if the MatchSaverZ could handle it. I was not optimistic.

Well, I was wrong. The seemingly flimsy thing held up. Frankly, I was a bit astonished. I kept waiting for the other shoe to drop, and it never did. Now, a longer class may give a different result, but I think that it has been shown that for MY OWN PROJECTED NEED, the MatchSaverZ most likely will work in the home defense role. I have doubts that it would hold up in the field in a military context, or as a patrol gun (getting banged up from being taken in and out of a locked carrier), but for a citizen in the home, I think it is durable enough. At least for this user.

Shotgun class

Taking firearms training classes is a good idea. Not only do you learn and improve your performance and build the skill set that you may need to save you in a life threatening emergency (cue reference to our current times) , you also get to test your gear under circumstances that may be tough. Will you be engaging in a firefight with a criminal assaulter that requires you to fire 1,500 rounds of ammo? I would hope not. Of course, again in reference to current events, that is a tad more feasible than it might have been last week, but still, even now it would be an incredible outlier/black swan event. However, putting your equipment through that level of demand can truly pressure test your gear, and most importantly HOW YOU INTERFACE WITH SAID GEAR. And if we are honest with ourselves, this should be an ongoing effort. New gear comes out, new methods are found for using extant gear, and we need to constantly check what we are doing and what we are carrying.

This past weekend, I had the opportunity to do just that by taking a class with one of my favorite instructors, Chris Fry. Yes, he is a very close friend so I am a bit biased, but I truly think he is one of the best around, and has an uncanny way of communicating especially to private citizens. Not really a surprise when you consider that over twenty years of running his company MDTS Training, he averaged over 1,000 students a year. That is a lot of time to perfect your craft and learn the best ways to get information across to people.

The course I took was a half day Fundamental Shotgun class, and in 5 hours we covered a lot of concepts and ideas, and we still managed to put our shotguns through live fire of over 150 rounds 9mostly birdshot, though the last portion was firing buck in a difficult evaluation drill, and testing the patterning of our guns with our loads. What was really helpful was that it gave me plenty of opportunity to hone in on some gear choices.

To sum up, poor gear really sucks, and well thought out and well made gear helps performance. It does not make you better, but it allows you to reach your potential much more effectively than poorer equipment does.

A few takeaways :

I personally have zero use for a sling on a shotgun – this is not a blanket statement for anyone else, but totally personal. As primarily a home defense tool for me, I saw little need for a sling except as a administration aid during classes. So I do have my main shotty (a Beretta 1301) set up with a QD single point. I used it only a bit in the Rangemaster Shotgun course I took from Tom Givens last June, but had more time to use it here, and I hated it. It got in the way of handling, reloading, and did nothing to help shooting, so about halfway through I removed it and have no desire to ever go back to one.

A red dot on a 1301 is as good as cheating as anything I have seen with firearms. The 1301 is already a light and fast handling gun, and manipulations are almost effortless, but adding a RD makes the actually firing part like it is on automatic. When we shot some temp drills (to allow you to find the best pace to functionally use the gun while still allowing for mental processing and correct recoil control), Chris allowed me to use his RD set up 1301 for part of it. My own was pretty nice, but adding that sighting system made it jump light years beyond. I am definitely going that route ASAP.

Wilderness Tactical makes awesome and bomb proof stuff. Their Shell belt, twin loader, and dump pouch were fantastic, and even after being tossed onto gravel, loaded/unloaded/reloaded constantly, they both look brand new. I have been a fan and customer of theirs since the mid-80’s, and this past Saturday only solidified that more.

Make sure you buy good shell cards if you use that ammo carry method. I have one from Vang Comp and Brown Coat Tactical that are super durable and even after heavy use, never lost a shell. I also have some crappy low priced ones (shown in the pic) that dropped rounds like a sieve. The price difference between the good stuff and the bad in tiny; the functionality gap between them is huge.

So take the opportunities in training courses to put the gear you may count on to help you protect your life or your loved ones to the test as often as you can.